In 2004, it seemed the hand-drawn animated film was soon to
be a thing of the past. Disney had decided to abandon the traditional
techniques as practised by Walt Disney in favour of computer animation, a decision
which likely stemmed from the declining interest in the former, and the
simultaneous stiff competition posed by the latter. While Brother Bear (2003) is widely perceived to be their swansong in
this field (prior to the revival of these techniques in 2009), the very last
traditionally animated ‘moo-vie’ of the period, Home on the Range (2004), a film about three cows’ attempts to
capture a cattle rustler, proved to be an udder disappointment (sorry, I
couldn’t resist). But was this film really just a load of bull?
Despite the weak and unoriginal plot, the film does have its
moments, although the humour is at times juvenile, crude or just plain silly.
Again, this is not necessarily bad, but it’s not for everyone. The yodelling
sequence, although hardly the epitome of intellectual humour and wit, is fun
and unexpected, though it does ultimately reduce the villain to a less-than-menacing
single joke. The crude humour is, at times, a little excessive and, to some,
might seem puerile, but it doesn’t degrade the film substantially. Ultimately,
the film is amusing. It’s not
hilarious, but it manages to raise a few smiles, at least.
Yet, despite it being a comedy, there are also several
attempts to create pathos. Naturally, this largely flounders not only due to
the film’s genre and comic theme, but also due to the characters and story
being rather bland, formulaic and uninteresting. Bonnie Raitt’s rendition of
‘Will the Sun Ever Shine Again’ is beautiful, and is the film’s one redeeming
feature in this respect. However, it nonetheless seems incongruous and not
in-keeping with the film’s ridiculous, outlandish tone. One of the film’s highlights
is its soundtrack, which manages to truly capture the essence of the classic
western. It’s just a shame that the film itself is nowhere near as grand as the
score misleadingly indicates.
The animation is average, but far from the worst I have
seen. In fact, the animation quality itself is acceptable – it’s the style
that’s questionable. One might argue that it suits the setting and comic,
light-hearted genre, but ultimately the ‘geometric’ designs simply make it even
less engaging – the drawings have edge but lack warmth and character.
Overall, the film is a bit flat. It’s not nearly as bad as
some say, but it’s distinctly weaker than most other Disney features. As
previously stated, there are elements that work very well – the music is
fantastic, the voiceovers are decent, and it is, generally, funny. It must be
said, however, that the film is merely an average experience. An amusing farce
it may be, but a little patch of heaven, it is not.
No comments:
Post a Comment