Thursday, 10 November 2016

A Comedy Theatre Group: "Aladdin and his Magic Teapot" Promo Video

A little something I've been working on... A brand new advertisement in advance of A Comedy Theatre Group's (ACT's) pantomime this December at Gig Mill Methodist Church Hall in Stourbridge, West Midlands, UK. You can watch it below!

Showings are at 7pm on Friday 9th, and 2pm and 7pm on Saturday 10th December.



For tickets, call 07954 692 593 or 01384 824 766, or email acomedytheatregroup@hotmail.co.uk.
This video was written and directed by Phill Liptrot of ACT, and animated and edited by myself. Thanks to Laura Liptrot and Alan Slack for lending their vocals to Aladdin and the Genie, it turned out awesome!

Finally, I urge you to go and check out ACT's YouTube channel, and to give them a like on Facebook (links below). It's a great little community theatre company that deserves all the support it can get! Thanks guys, see you soon!

ACT channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1ytqWpoFrtfKJTdlmEI2QA

ACT Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stourbridgecomedy/

Saturday, 15 October 2016

Casper (PS1 Review)

A bit of a throwback in time for Halloween! This is a brand new video review of an old, forgotten PS1 game from my childhood. Sorry in advance for the bad acting, bad language, and occasionally bad sound. I really enjoyed making this and, unlike a lot of trials lately, I figured it was worthy of an upload! Enjoy guys!

Michael

Sunday, 18 September 2016

Sausage Party (2016) – A Review


It’s unsurprising that many cinemagoers have had high hopes for Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan’s Sausage Party. If nothing else, it represents the antithesis to what we’ve come to expect from mainstream animation. With music by prolific award-winning composer Alan Menken, and a screenplay co-written by Seth Rogen, Sausage Party promises to be an adult parody of your average Disney/Pixar flick, filled to the brim with all the ingredients one would never normally use to make an animated feature film. Unfortunately, though, one can’t help but feel as though it’s a bit undercooked.
Columbia Pictures, 2016
The movie opens at Shopwell’s, a supermarket, where all the anthropomorphised food and grocery items dream of being taken to ‘the Great Beyond’ – a utopian world in which shoppers are perceived to be gods who take them in. Frank, a sausage voiced by Seth Rogen, fantasises about living in this realm with his hot dog bun girlfriend Brenda (Kristen Wiig). However, after having been chosen for purchase by a shopper, their dreams are shattered by the revelation – courtesy of a tortured returned Honey Mustard jar – that the Great Beyond is not what they’ve been led to believe. An accident leads to the characters’ being flung out of the shopping cart, scrambling for freedom. In addition, an aggressive douche, named… well, Douche, breaks his nozzle in the collision and vows revenge against Frank. It’s up to Frank, Brenda, their ‘deformed’ sausage friend Barry (cue the inevitable penis jokes) and their other foodstuff friends to find out the truth about their existence and save themselves from being chopped, ground, drunk and boiled alive.
Columbia Pictures, 2016
As you can probably tell, Sausage Party is not a movie that should be taken seriously. It’s a difficult film to review, in the sense that it obviously is not going to be to everybody’s tastes, but it ultimately achieves what it sets out to do. It’s irreverent, insulting, vulgar and crass, but that’s kind of the point. Naturally, I have some personal quibbles, mostly revolving around the overuse of vulgar humour, the unnecessarily strong language throughout, and its strong sex and drug references. But while it does go a little too far at times, this conversely represents the film’s main appeal for many others, and so I can’t really criticise what I personally find distasteful, as this film, from its opening scenes to its end credits, is nothing but distasteful, and it’s fully aware of that fact. What I can say is that there is nothing overly surprising about this film – at least in terms of its comedy. Some of its puns are fairly clever, but it relies far too heavily on f-bombs and sex jokes to maintain its humour. This criticism may sound contradictory based on my previous comment, but the problem isn’t really related to its crudity; the problem relates to the fact that the prolific use of such vulgarity is simply not funny. Evidently, this is geared predominantly to an audience who finds the mere concept of penises and sex hilarious.

What is surprising about the movie, however, is how thematically profound it turns out to be. Penis jokes and f-bombs aside, Sausage Party provides a relevant social commentary on the impact and hypocrisy of religion and an all-too-familiar misguided belief system. That said, it’s not strictly atheistic – rather, it seems to condemn organised religion but indicate that higher powers do exist, just not in the form the foods anticipated. Beyond that, its message gets a little muddled, mired in its excessive vulgarity and overindulgence in phallic and sexualised imagery. And that’s fine – first and foremost it’s an adult comedy and whatever message it attempts to convey is likely of little concern to its target audience. All the same, while arguably underdeveloped, it is somewhat refreshing to find that the movie bears far more substance than you might initially expect.
Columbia Pictures, 2016
Ultimately though, the sophistication stops dead there, and there’s little else to get your teeth into, so to speak. It otherwise relies on some very clichéd ‘tropes’ to maintain its status as an ‘adult comedy’. In fact, it pretty much ticks every item on the checklist. Bad language? Yep. Racism? You got it. Copious amounts of sex? Absolutely. That’s not to mention the allusions to drug use throughout the film, which involve the grocery items standing around ‘getting baked’. Now, I’m not saying subversive humour doesn’t work. Sure it does – but only when it’s done well. And sadly much of the actual comedy is lost because it tries too hard to defy our expectations of what an animated film should represent. Again, for many people this is the point of the film, but while such a movie is something of a rarity, it’s been done plenty of times before, and it’s no longer a spectacle. And let’s face it, likening a sausage to a penis is hardly an original idea.

Overall, it’s difficult to summarise one’s thoughts on the movie. As stated previously, it’s crude, vulgar, and offensive, and in that sense it fulfils its purpose. But beyond that, it’s a baffling concoction of obscenity and sophistication that fails to satisfactorily deliver the latter because of its rather tiresome infatuation with the former. There are some mildly amusing scenes, but coarseness alone, even while presented incongruously within the abstract confines of an animation, is not a funny concept. Even so, its condemnation of religion, while unoriginal, bears some merit for being thought-provoking even if the message it attempts to convey is somewhat half-baked. In all, if subversive humour is your tipple, there’s a chance it might be to your taste, but for the more refined cinemagoer, it just barely provides ample food for thought.

Friday, 9 September 2016

BALLOONS (2016) - i don't have a nose animated short film

Very excited to announce the release of my latest project, 'BALLOONS: A NARRATIVE JOURNEY OF GRIEF, GREED AND RECOVERY'. The video can be viewed below. Hope you enjoy it. Please feel free to leave a comment and share!

Thanks,

Michael (and Felix)

Synopsis: Baby loses his balloon, and resorts to extreme measures to compensate for his loss.

Saturday, 6 August 2016

‘Finding Dory’ (2016): An Unforgettable Experience? - A Review


I’m aware – and by now I’m sure you’re probably all aware too – that, generally speaking, I am not too keen on sequels. Often (though not always) sequels pale in comparison to their original counterparts, usually because, more often than not, they are produced with little else in mind besides milking an already successful franchise. That said, every so often when a sequel is announced, I usually like to give it the benefit of the doubt and broach it with a clear mind – especially when the sequel is the product of such a renowned animation company as Pixar. And that leads us to this year’s offering, the widely anticipated Finding Dory. The ever-optimistic, forgetful Blue Tang, voiced by Ellen DeGeneres, captured the hearts of many a cinemagoer back in 2003 as the side-splitting and endearing comedy relief of Finding Nemo, which turned out to be one of Pixar’s greatest films to date. Obviously, a sequel was expected. But the question is, can Dory carry a story?
Disney/Pixar, 2016
Directed by Pixar stalwart Andrew Stanton, Finding Dory takes place one year after the original movie, and is interwoven with sentimental flashbacks concerning Dory’s childhood and her eventually losing her parents (yes – despite the title, it’s Dory’s parents we’re finding here, not Dory). In the present, Dory is living peacefully alongside Marlin (Albert Brooks) and Nemo (now voiced by Hayden Rolence, replacing Alexander Gould). But before long, she is plagued by a memory, prompting her to locate her lost family. By chance, she winds up captured by the Marine Life Institute, which happens to be where her parents supposedly are. There she meets Hank (Ed O’Neill), a grumpy seven-legged octopus, her old friend Destiny (Kaitlin Olson), a short-sighted whale shark, and Bailey (Ty Burrell), a beluga whale with the ability to echolocate. The rest of the film sees Dory, Marlin and Nemo traverse the entire institute to find her parents, in many extraordinary ways, via various… interesting modes of transportation, shall we say.
Disney/Pixar, 2016
As clever as this can sometimes be, this is actually a major problem with the film; it’s simply *too* unrealistic. Okay, so it’s an animated film, but a degree of realism is still required for the film to be engaging in any way. In Finding Nemo, the escapades of the main characters maintained at least a semblance of credibility by, at the very least, the characters’ making allusions to the outlandishness of the situation. This film, however, really pushes the boundaries of believability, to the extent that we’re expected to accept that an octopus can convincingly disguise itself as a human baby without anybody catching on. And don’t get me started on the film’s climactic scenes, which see Dory well and truly jump the shark. Even overlooking these scenes, the film is plagued by clichéd and sappy sentimental scenes, and far too many coincidences that propel the narrative. There’s just no sense of threat. Just when you think the characters are in danger, there just happens to be a water bucket nearby, or a conveniently-placed drain, or, oh I don’t know, a super-stealthy other-worldly octopus with the power to camouflage himself as just about anything. In fact, Hank encapsulates most of what is wrong with the movie. As likeable as he is, he’s essentially a walking deus ex machina. This isn’t good storytelling, Pixar. This is contrivance at its worst.
Disney/Pixar, 2016
Another major issue – and one that I was anticipating – is that Dory works far better as a side character, a comedy relief. In this film, she’s just annoying. Her backstory, too, is a little lazily constructed. There’s nothing hugely innovative about her parents’ characterisations – they merely conform to the ‘loving parent’ cliché, enabling Pixar to play the sentiment card yet again. When it’s done well, Pixar’s sentimentally-driven narratives can pack a real punch. We all know that. The problem is that when the narrative is otherwise so detached from reality, these ‘emotional’ scenes are just conveyed as forced and, put simply, they do not work, no matter how big baby Dory’s eyeballs are. It genuinely upsets me that the average Pixar release has, in recent years, become so bland and formulaic.
Disney/Pixar, 2016
In all, it’s hardly the worst thing you’ll ever see, but it does indeed require substantial suspension of disbelief. Expect no surprises and you might even enjoy it. In parts, it’s amusing, and although it’s predictable, it’s not what I’d call boring. Visually, as usual for a Pixar movie, it’s sublime, and the voice acting is of an expectedly high standard. But in terms of conveying a good story, Finding Dory sadly struggles to stay afloat.


Monday, 1 August 2016

Zootopia: The Sophisticated Disney Flick?

While it’s always irked me somewhat that animation is perpetually perceived to be universally for children, I’m actually rather surprised that this assumption prevails despite the evident expansion of the animated genre in recent years, and its evolution into a more lucid representation of our (at times hypocritical) political landscape. Disney’s latest feature film release Zootopia tackles the subject of politics more astutely and boldly than any other movie in their canon, and touches upon some surprisingly mature and ‘human’ themes. Having now seen the film more than once, I feel comfortable in proclaiming that I believe Zootopia succeeds in epitomising the anthropomorphic genre, with a sophisticated societal commentary that is of such profundity that we’re left without any choice but to expect only greater things from what is already a powerfully successful and world-renowned company.

That said, the growing relevance of the animated movie also anticipates some detrimental qualities. A film as sharp as Zootopia is only so meaningful to an audience in the sense that it delineates an unequivocally 21st-century landscape; which is fine – only it precipitates an inevitable decline in relevance over an unfixed amount of time. Sure, the film will always bear meaning to an extent, but the fact remains that this movie arrived at just the right time, when prejudice and stereotypes are unfortunately rife (particularly where race and gender are concerned) and the western political environment remains unsettling at best. Indeed, much of Zootopia’s humour derives from a surprisingly cynical (yet light-hearted) take on 21st century lives, attitudes and technologies. As with many other Disney movies, it’s highly moralistic – a fable, if you will – but manages to conduct its hilariously truthful commentary without becoming too preachy.
Judy Hopps - a 'bunny cop'; Disney, 2016
Again, this raises the question ‘who is this film aimed at?’ which, typically, is a difficult question to answer, perhaps more so than usual. Much of the humour is very adult-oriented. Sure, kids will laugh at sloths – they’re hilariously slow and the comic timing is perfect. But the funniest aspect of that scene is that they’re employees of the DMV – a joke that is more likely to resonate with older audiences than younger ones. The same goes for the ‘Naturalist Club’ scenes, and a surprisingly well-executed Godfather parody. It’s incredibly sophisticated for such a bright and colourful movie whose protagonist is a bunny rabbit. Ultimately, this rather makes me question what age range appreciates this masterpiece more. It almost feels as though the animated flick has grown alongside me, and finally reached a peak that is more than a challenge to equal.

While there are few animated Disney features that I would consider ‘bad’, I’ve noticed a definite evolution in their sophistication and originality – ironically at a time when Pixar, a company once renowned for its original efforts, has plummeted to the depths of mediocrity. Since 2009, the Disney flick (with the exception of Frozen (2013)) has arguably improved with its every release. Wreck-It Ralph (2012) proved that a heartfelt, solid narrative could be dictated in the world of a video-game arcade, while Big Hero 6 (2014), though predictable, managed to maintain a touching, hilarious and ultimately gripping story. Zootopia not only continues this winning streak, but transcends it with its sharp commentary on contemporary culture. However, while one can often easily identify the period in which a movie was released, either by its soundtrack or artistic style, the majority of animated flicks remain timeless. Whether Zootopia’s very modern setting bears the same deep-rooted transparency remains to be seen.
Disney, 2016