Sunday, 18 September 2016

Sausage Party (2016) – A Review


It’s unsurprising that many cinemagoers have had high hopes for Conrad Vernon and Greg Tiernan’s Sausage Party. If nothing else, it represents the antithesis to what we’ve come to expect from mainstream animation. With music by prolific award-winning composer Alan Menken, and a screenplay co-written by Seth Rogen, Sausage Party promises to be an adult parody of your average Disney/Pixar flick, filled to the brim with all the ingredients one would never normally use to make an animated feature film. Unfortunately, though, one can’t help but feel as though it’s a bit undercooked.
Columbia Pictures, 2016
The movie opens at Shopwell’s, a supermarket, where all the anthropomorphised food and grocery items dream of being taken to ‘the Great Beyond’ – a utopian world in which shoppers are perceived to be gods who take them in. Frank, a sausage voiced by Seth Rogen, fantasises about living in this realm with his hot dog bun girlfriend Brenda (Kristen Wiig). However, after having been chosen for purchase by a shopper, their dreams are shattered by the revelation – courtesy of a tortured returned Honey Mustard jar – that the Great Beyond is not what they’ve been led to believe. An accident leads to the characters’ being flung out of the shopping cart, scrambling for freedom. In addition, an aggressive douche, named… well, Douche, breaks his nozzle in the collision and vows revenge against Frank. It’s up to Frank, Brenda, their ‘deformed’ sausage friend Barry (cue the inevitable penis jokes) and their other foodstuff friends to find out the truth about their existence and save themselves from being chopped, ground, drunk and boiled alive.
Columbia Pictures, 2016
As you can probably tell, Sausage Party is not a movie that should be taken seriously. It’s a difficult film to review, in the sense that it obviously is not going to be to everybody’s tastes, but it ultimately achieves what it sets out to do. It’s irreverent, insulting, vulgar and crass, but that’s kind of the point. Naturally, I have some personal quibbles, mostly revolving around the overuse of vulgar humour, the unnecessarily strong language throughout, and its strong sex and drug references. But while it does go a little too far at times, this conversely represents the film’s main appeal for many others, and so I can’t really criticise what I personally find distasteful, as this film, from its opening scenes to its end credits, is nothing but distasteful, and it’s fully aware of that fact. What I can say is that there is nothing overly surprising about this film – at least in terms of its comedy. Some of its puns are fairly clever, but it relies far too heavily on f-bombs and sex jokes to maintain its humour. This criticism may sound contradictory based on my previous comment, but the problem isn’t really related to its crudity; the problem relates to the fact that the prolific use of such vulgarity is simply not funny. Evidently, this is geared predominantly to an audience who finds the mere concept of penises and sex hilarious.

What is surprising about the movie, however, is how thematically profound it turns out to be. Penis jokes and f-bombs aside, Sausage Party provides a relevant social commentary on the impact and hypocrisy of religion and an all-too-familiar misguided belief system. That said, it’s not strictly atheistic – rather, it seems to condemn organised religion but indicate that higher powers do exist, just not in the form the foods anticipated. Beyond that, its message gets a little muddled, mired in its excessive vulgarity and overindulgence in phallic and sexualised imagery. And that’s fine – first and foremost it’s an adult comedy and whatever message it attempts to convey is likely of little concern to its target audience. All the same, while arguably underdeveloped, it is somewhat refreshing to find that the movie bears far more substance than you might initially expect.
Columbia Pictures, 2016
Ultimately though, the sophistication stops dead there, and there’s little else to get your teeth into, so to speak. It otherwise relies on some very clichéd ‘tropes’ to maintain its status as an ‘adult comedy’. In fact, it pretty much ticks every item on the checklist. Bad language? Yep. Racism? You got it. Copious amounts of sex? Absolutely. That’s not to mention the allusions to drug use throughout the film, which involve the grocery items standing around ‘getting baked’. Now, I’m not saying subversive humour doesn’t work. Sure it does – but only when it’s done well. And sadly much of the actual comedy is lost because it tries too hard to defy our expectations of what an animated film should represent. Again, for many people this is the point of the film, but while such a movie is something of a rarity, it’s been done plenty of times before, and it’s no longer a spectacle. And let’s face it, likening a sausage to a penis is hardly an original idea.

Overall, it’s difficult to summarise one’s thoughts on the movie. As stated previously, it’s crude, vulgar, and offensive, and in that sense it fulfils its purpose. But beyond that, it’s a baffling concoction of obscenity and sophistication that fails to satisfactorily deliver the latter because of its rather tiresome infatuation with the former. There are some mildly amusing scenes, but coarseness alone, even while presented incongruously within the abstract confines of an animation, is not a funny concept. Even so, its condemnation of religion, while unoriginal, bears some merit for being thought-provoking even if the message it attempts to convey is somewhat half-baked. In all, if subversive humour is your tipple, there’s a chance it might be to your taste, but for the more refined cinemagoer, it just barely provides ample food for thought.

Friday, 9 September 2016

BALLOONS (2016) - i don't have a nose animated short film

Very excited to announce the release of my latest project, 'BALLOONS: A NARRATIVE JOURNEY OF GRIEF, GREED AND RECOVERY'. The video can be viewed below. Hope you enjoy it. Please feel free to leave a comment and share!

Thanks,

Michael (and Felix)

Synopsis: Baby loses his balloon, and resorts to extreme measures to compensate for his loss.

Saturday, 6 August 2016

‘Finding Dory’ (2016): An Unforgettable Experience? - A Review


I’m aware – and by now I’m sure you’re probably all aware too – that, generally speaking, I am not too keen on sequels. Often (though not always) sequels pale in comparison to their original counterparts, usually because, more often than not, they are produced with little else in mind besides milking an already successful franchise. That said, every so often when a sequel is announced, I usually like to give it the benefit of the doubt and broach it with a clear mind – especially when the sequel is the product of such a renowned animation company as Pixar. And that leads us to this year’s offering, the widely anticipated Finding Dory. The ever-optimistic, forgetful Blue Tang, voiced by Ellen DeGeneres, captured the hearts of many a cinemagoer back in 2003 as the side-splitting and endearing comedy relief of Finding Nemo, which turned out to be one of Pixar’s greatest films to date. Obviously, a sequel was expected. But the question is, can Dory carry a story?
Disney/Pixar, 2016
Directed by Pixar stalwart Andrew Stanton, Finding Dory takes place one year after the original movie, and is interwoven with sentimental flashbacks concerning Dory’s childhood and her eventually losing her parents (yes – despite the title, it’s Dory’s parents we’re finding here, not Dory). In the present, Dory is living peacefully alongside Marlin (Albert Brooks) and Nemo (now voiced by Hayden Rolence, replacing Alexander Gould). But before long, she is plagued by a memory, prompting her to locate her lost family. By chance, she winds up captured by the Marine Life Institute, which happens to be where her parents supposedly are. There she meets Hank (Ed O’Neill), a grumpy seven-legged octopus, her old friend Destiny (Kaitlin Olson), a short-sighted whale shark, and Bailey (Ty Burrell), a beluga whale with the ability to echolocate. The rest of the film sees Dory, Marlin and Nemo traverse the entire institute to find her parents, in many extraordinary ways, via various… interesting modes of transportation, shall we say.
Disney/Pixar, 2016
As clever as this can sometimes be, this is actually a major problem with the film; it’s simply *too* unrealistic. Okay, so it’s an animated film, but a degree of realism is still required for the film to be engaging in any way. In Finding Nemo, the escapades of the main characters maintained at least a semblance of credibility by, at the very least, the characters’ making allusions to the outlandishness of the situation. This film, however, really pushes the boundaries of believability, to the extent that we’re expected to accept that an octopus can convincingly disguise itself as a human baby without anybody catching on. And don’t get me started on the film’s climactic scenes, which see Dory well and truly jump the shark. Even overlooking these scenes, the film is plagued by clichéd and sappy sentimental scenes, and far too many coincidences that propel the narrative. There’s just no sense of threat. Just when you think the characters are in danger, there just happens to be a water bucket nearby, or a conveniently-placed drain, or, oh I don’t know, a super-stealthy other-worldly octopus with the power to camouflage himself as just about anything. In fact, Hank encapsulates most of what is wrong with the movie. As likeable as he is, he’s essentially a walking deus ex machina. This isn’t good storytelling, Pixar. This is contrivance at its worst.
Disney/Pixar, 2016
Another major issue – and one that I was anticipating – is that Dory works far better as a side character, a comedy relief. In this film, she’s just annoying. Her backstory, too, is a little lazily constructed. There’s nothing hugely innovative about her parents’ characterisations – they merely conform to the ‘loving parent’ cliché, enabling Pixar to play the sentiment card yet again. When it’s done well, Pixar’s sentimentally-driven narratives can pack a real punch. We all know that. The problem is that when the narrative is otherwise so detached from reality, these ‘emotional’ scenes are just conveyed as forced and, put simply, they do not work, no matter how big baby Dory’s eyeballs are. It genuinely upsets me that the average Pixar release has, in recent years, become so bland and formulaic.
Disney/Pixar, 2016
In all, it’s hardly the worst thing you’ll ever see, but it does indeed require substantial suspension of disbelief. Expect no surprises and you might even enjoy it. In parts, it’s amusing, and although it’s predictable, it’s not what I’d call boring. Visually, as usual for a Pixar movie, it’s sublime, and the voice acting is of an expectedly high standard. But in terms of conveying a good story, Finding Dory sadly struggles to stay afloat.


Monday, 1 August 2016

Zootopia: The Sophisticated Disney Flick?

While it’s always irked me somewhat that animation is perpetually perceived to be universally for children, I’m actually rather surprised that this assumption prevails despite the evident expansion of the animated genre in recent years, and its evolution into a more lucid representation of our (at times hypocritical) political landscape. Disney’s latest feature film release Zootopia tackles the subject of politics more astutely and boldly than any other movie in their canon, and touches upon some surprisingly mature and ‘human’ themes. Having now seen the film more than once, I feel comfortable in proclaiming that I believe Zootopia succeeds in epitomising the anthropomorphic genre, with a sophisticated societal commentary that is of such profundity that we’re left without any choice but to expect only greater things from what is already a powerfully successful and world-renowned company.

That said, the growing relevance of the animated movie also anticipates some detrimental qualities. A film as sharp as Zootopia is only so meaningful to an audience in the sense that it delineates an unequivocally 21st-century landscape; which is fine – only it precipitates an inevitable decline in relevance over an unfixed amount of time. Sure, the film will always bear meaning to an extent, but the fact remains that this movie arrived at just the right time, when prejudice and stereotypes are unfortunately rife (particularly where race and gender are concerned) and the western political environment remains unsettling at best. Indeed, much of Zootopia’s humour derives from a surprisingly cynical (yet light-hearted) take on 21st century lives, attitudes and technologies. As with many other Disney movies, it’s highly moralistic – a fable, if you will – but manages to conduct its hilariously truthful commentary without becoming too preachy.
Judy Hopps - a 'bunny cop'; Disney, 2016
Again, this raises the question ‘who is this film aimed at?’ which, typically, is a difficult question to answer, perhaps more so than usual. Much of the humour is very adult-oriented. Sure, kids will laugh at sloths – they’re hilariously slow and the comic timing is perfect. But the funniest aspect of that scene is that they’re employees of the DMV – a joke that is more likely to resonate with older audiences than younger ones. The same goes for the ‘Naturalist Club’ scenes, and a surprisingly well-executed Godfather parody. It’s incredibly sophisticated for such a bright and colourful movie whose protagonist is a bunny rabbit. Ultimately, this rather makes me question what age range appreciates this masterpiece more. It almost feels as though the animated flick has grown alongside me, and finally reached a peak that is more than a challenge to equal.

While there are few animated Disney features that I would consider ‘bad’, I’ve noticed a definite evolution in their sophistication and originality – ironically at a time when Pixar, a company once renowned for its original efforts, has plummeted to the depths of mediocrity. Since 2009, the Disney flick (with the exception of Frozen (2013)) has arguably improved with its every release. Wreck-It Ralph (2012) proved that a heartfelt, solid narrative could be dictated in the world of a video-game arcade, while Big Hero 6 (2014), though predictable, managed to maintain a touching, hilarious and ultimately gripping story. Zootopia not only continues this winning streak, but transcends it with its sharp commentary on contemporary culture. However, while one can often easily identify the period in which a movie was released, either by its soundtrack or artistic style, the majority of animated flicks remain timeless. Whether Zootopia’s very modern setting bears the same deep-rooted transparency remains to be seen.
Disney, 2016

Wednesday, 22 June 2016

Forgotten Features: ‘Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron’ (2002)

Like horses? Like Bryan Adams? Well then, do I have just the film for you! Way back in 2002, DreamWorks Animation unveiled one of their most ambitious movies to date – one that has more or less sadly been forgotten about. As their follow-up to the ground-breaking CG comedy Shrek (2001), it’s not hard to understand why. By that point, DreamWorks Animation had just begun to define their own, almost subversive, genre – one infused with gags galore, and one which was often cited as the ‘anti-Disney’, boasting the acerbic and adult-friendly, snarky, sarcastic wit. The swamp-dwelling ogre would later go on to become the face of DreamWorks, and set the tone for their subsequent features. Indeed, this is an entirely different beast.

The film I speak of is Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron. And contrary to many middle-of-the-road reviews, it is, in fact, a very watchable movie. That is, if you like horses. And are willing to put up with copious amounts of Bryan Adams. Yes. Bryan Adams. I must admit, I, myself, was somewhat confused by their (over)use of the ‘Everything I Do’ singer, particularly since he wasn’t exactly what you’d call ‘current’, even fourteen years ago, but the soundtrack is nonetheless decent. None of the songs are hugely memorable, but they are mostly utilised appropriately in order to set the scene and dictate the story, alongside a humourless and altogether rather low-key narration by Matt Damon, who lends his vocals to Spirit’s conscience. Perhaps these techniques were applied to give the film some levity, to make it somewhat more accessible to a broader audience. In any case, it’s not really necessary. Too many times, Damon states the obvious and you find yourself consciously retorting “Well yes, we just saw that happen!” And, while I (apparently unlike many others) have nothing against Bryan Adams’ music, I can’t help but feel that some of the more dramatic and emotional scenes might have had more of an impact without the accompaniment of his gravelly vocals, and some frankly ill-placed contemporary pop-rock. It’s not a major problem, but it does sometimes detract from the film’s ambience and setting.
DreamWorks Animation, 2002

Contrary to what many early reviews stated, Spirit actually does maintain a compelling narrative, in the sense that it’s not boring. The ‘problem’ is that it’s not nearly complex enough to stand out as an animated classic. Put simply, not enough happens in it for it to be held in as high regard as, say, The Road to El Dorado (2000). Some may also argue that it is lacking the sharp wit of some of the other DreamWorks flicks of the era. That said, this is a very different kind of movie for DreamWorks Animation, and one I feel may have been unfairly neglected over the years. It’s pretty ambitious in the sense that, besides Bryan Adams and Damon’s narration, there is very little dialogue whatsoever. The fact that it manages to maintain your attention throughout without resorting to crude humour, throwaway gags and needless side-characters to pad out the narrative is an impressive feat indeed. And, while we’re on the subject of visual appeal, the animation is nothing short of spectacular. Even by today’s high standards, some of the scenes with Spirit galloping on the open plains are breath-taking. The slick blend of traditional and CG animation is seamless – to the point at which it’s difficult to tell where the one ends and the other begins. If there’s one reason you should see this film, it’s for the visuals.
DreamWorks Animation, 2002
So if this film is so good, why is it so underrated? Well, it’s a bit of an oddity in the sense that it’s hard to pinpoint a specific target audience for the movie. That is, unless you’re a huge fan of horses. And Bryan Adams. Its plot is a little simplistic for your average adult audience, and it lacks the fast-paced, gag-infused restlessness that typically appeals to toddlers. In any case, its plot doesn’t necessarily *need* to be any more complex than it is – it merely falls short of being a masterpiece as a result, and is consequently rather unmemorable, particularly considering its running time. All the same, it’s diverse enough to stand out from the rest of DreamWorks’ canon as one that is unique, at least in some respects. It’s nice to see a film from DreamWorks that wears its heart on its sleeve, whose main appeal is not cheap slapstick. It’s not perfect, but it serves as proof that DreamWorks are far from a mere one trick pony.

Monday, 16 May 2016

‘Sausage Party’ Trailer: Adult Animation Cooked to Perfection, or the ‘Wurst’ Movie of 2016?

Considering the primary target market for the genre, mainstream animation seldom bears any ground-breaking shock value. Only every once in a while does something alternative and daring draw in an audience, and even then its success is often marred by the stigma attached to animation; a stigma which unfortunately overlooks the genre as one that is accessible to more mature audiences. Seth Rogen’s Sausage Party (2016), while hardly making itself out to be anything uniquely ground-breaking, subverts this oft-enforced stigmatism by littering its feature with f-bombs and sex jokes galore, which is indeed a bold, if unoriginal, venture.
Sony Pictures Imageworks, 2016
As I’ve established previously, I wholeheartedly endorse the transference of the animated flick into adult territory, mostly because I’ve always felt as though the predominant alignment of animation with children’s entertainment to be somewhat contrived and narrow-minded. That said, this isn’t quite what I had in mind. Sausage Party, as evidenced by the uncensored trailer, is a crude and vulgar parody of animation as we know it; a subversive, almost twisted take on the standard Disney or Pixar formula. Which is fine – it’s clear that this is indeed what the movie sets out to achieve. Most notably we can identify a similarity to Pixar’s feature film debut Toy Story (1995), in the sense that the food yearns to be purchased by a human and loved, the difference being, of course, that the food undergoes an horrific maltreatment (from their perspective) which obviously results in their being peeled, cooked, boiled and ‘eaten alive’. The concept is funny, undoubtedly. However, it’s likely not going to be to everybody’s taste, so to speak.
Sony Pictures Imageworks, 2016
As with many other ‘adult’ animations, Sausage Party’s adult appeal is more so in its coarseness than in its themes. Sure, the idea of processed meat being, er, ‘slaughtered’ isn’t exactly what you’d consider child-friendly, but it would hardly constitute an R rating. Rather, what makes this movie adult, as one might gather from the trailer, is its strong language, sex and drug references. And don’t get me wrong, this is a fun, alternative approach to animated film, but it’s not one we haven’t seen before. The biggest appeal of the film is that such adult animations are infrequent, and offer subversive humour that no other medium can equal. It’s just such a shame that there’s no middle ground – a mature animated feature aimed at those who do not identify with the appeal of the vulgar.

Regardless, it’s refreshing to see adult animation continue to appeal to the masses, even if it is purely for its ironic crudity. Initial responses seem to be generally encouraging, and while it does run the risk of rehashing what we’ve already grown accustomed to with adult animation, it might prove effective in propelling the animated film to new ground in general. The trailer implies this is nothing revolutionary, but if lowbrow vulgarity helps to break the stigma, this movie could prove to be a real ‘wiener’.
Click to view the trailer below.
WARNING: Contains strong language and suggestive themes: